Throughout the animals' reign on the farm, Napoleon and Squealer contemplate the possibility of Jones' return as a threat, keeping most of the other animals in fear, and thus, submission. They question the group, "Surely there is no one among you who wants to see Jones come back?" Do you think that this was a valid threat? Do you feel that, overall, the animals were better or worse off once they were in control of the farm?

The threat the pigs make about the return of Jones and the animals' situation after the revolution can be analyzed in the following manner:

- The threat is not valid, but the animals do not realize that. They hated the life they had when Jones was in control so much that they would rather be controlled by Napoleon.

- Overall, the animals were worse once they were in control of the farm. At the very beginning, especially when Snowball was still with them, life was good. However, as soon as Napoleon took over, their life and work conditions became worse than they were under Jones.

In "Animal Farm," a novella by George Orwell, the animals rebel against Jones, their human owner.

Their purpose is to take over the farm and build a new society for themselves - one in which all animals are equal.

At first, things seem to go well. The pigs are chosen to be in charge, since they are the smartest among the animals. Snowball, in special, is the pig who most wants to achieve the animals' purposes.

However, the pig Napoleon decides to become a dictator. He kicks Snowball out, begins exploiting the animals, lies to them, and threatens them.

He often asks them if they would rather have Jones back. Even though the threat is not valid, the animals always fall for it.

Their conditions are worse under Napoleon than they were under Jones. But they have been convinced that life is better now.

Learn more about the topic here:

https://brainly.com/question/15601597?referrer=searchResults