How does the author of “The Journey to Acceptance” show a favorable bias toward Mendel’s research and an unfavorable bias toward the opinions of Mendel’s scientific peers?

A.) The author contrasts Mendel’s theories against the theories of the scientists of Mendel’s day.

B.) The author does not spend equal time explaining the theories of Mendel’s scientific peers.

C.) The author uses specific diction such as “profound impact” when referencing Mendel’s work and “very small understanding” when expressing the scientists’ beliefs.

D.) The author shows how the scientists’ blending theory is similar to Mendel’s research and then refers to Mendel’s work as “the laws of Mendelian inheritance”, making it sound important.

The author uses specific diction such as "deep impact" when referring to Mendel's work and "very little understanding" when talking about Mendel's scientific peers, as shown in option C.

We can arrive at this answer because:

Diction refers to the use of specific words to express the thoughts or information that the author wants to express to the reader.
In “The Journey to Acceptance” the author uses diction to express his position on the research by Mendel and Mendel’s scientific peers.
In this case, he uses the words “profound impact” to demonstrate how Mendel's research was important to the scientific community, showing a favorable bias to this research.
However, the author uses the diction “very small understanding” to refer to Mendel's scientific peers, showing that this element was of little importance for the scientific field and positioning a negative bias.

In this case, we can reinforce how important diction is for the establishment of a well-structured text.

More information:

https://brainly.com/question/23480929?referrer=searchResults

1andonlylondongo 1andonlylondongo · Answer 2

1andonlylondongo 1andonlylondongo

Answer:

its option c

Explanation:

Answer Link