Answer :
The option C, “because 0 is in this interval, we cannot conclude that there is a difference in newspaper reading, on average, for females and males” is correct.
In the given question, the UGA Journalism Department is interesting in determining if there is a significant difference in the number of hours, on average per week, that UGA males and UGA female students spend reading any online or printed newspaper.
Randomly selected students at UGA were asked how many hours per week they read any online or printed newspaper, their age, and gender. The 95% confidence interval for reading newspapers on μ(F)-μ(M) is (-1.1, 1.3).
1) We have to interpret this confidence interval. The given options are:
• Because 0 is not in this interval, we cannot conclude that there is a difference in newspaper reading, on average, for females and males.
• Because 0 is not in this interval, we can conclude that there is a difference in newspaper reading, on average, for females and males.
• Because 0 is in this interval, we cannot conclude that there is a difference in newspaper reading, on average, for females and males.
• Because 0 is in this interval, we can conclude that there is a difference in newspaper reading, on average, for females and males.
Since there interval was given.
The given interval for the 95% confidence interval for reading newspapers on μ(F)-μ(M) is (-1.1, 1.3).
Since the value of interval is between -1.1 and 1.3. So 0 is in this interval. So we cannot conclude that there is a difference in newspaper reading, on average, for females and male.
So the option C, “because 0 is in this interval, we cannot conclude that there is a difference in newspaper reading, on average, for females and males” is correct.
To learn more about confidence interval link is here
brainly.com/question/29657446
#SPJ4